Town Council Approves Plan For Development Of Ninigret Park
The Charlestown Town Council has approved its $39.5-million plan for the development of Ninigret Park. The “Ninigret Park Utilization Plan Update 2025” is a long-term strategy or blueprint and will serve as a guide for decision-making and future development, according to a statement by the Town Council at the front of the plan document. With the adoption of the Utilization Plan, the Town Council is now turning its attention to its implementation.
At its upcoming meeting on Monday, July 14, the Town Council will discuss and take possible action on two items related to the development of Ninigret Park: (1) the Park and Recreation Department Director’s report regarding the Department’s long-term needs and the proposed construction project in Ninigret Park and (2) expanding the Council’s previous directive to the Parks and Recreation Department to include other parts of the Utilization Plan, specifically “mapping festival areas.” According to the meeting packet, Councilor Marr will propose the following: “The new directive would be expanded to include research and recommendations of certain parts of the Ninagret [sic] Park Master Plan specifically regarding mapping out location(s) for festival areas.”
Regarding the previous directive, on April 14, the Town Council directed the Parks and Recreation Department to explore a construction project in Ninigret Park that was to include permanent office space for the Department, bathrooms, storage, programming room, summer camp necessities, and any other necessary options.
At the same meeting, the Town Council voted to add $75,000 to the budget for the “Parks and Recreation Department relocation project.” Placing the construction project plan as a warrant item on the Financial Referendum next June appeared to be the target.
In May, the Ninigret Park Community Center Subcommittee was formed. At its meeting on May 12, the Town Council clarified that “the purpose of the Subcommittee was to include an assessment of the Park and Recreation Department’s facility needs for the upcoming years.”
Regarding festival areas, what is now called the Public Events Space is located, as it was in the 2014 plan, within the 55-acre municipal parcel in the northern part of Ninigret. The Utilization Plan discusses the two current large events with regional draw: the Seafood Festival and Rhythm and Roots. The size of this area has been calculated based on how these current events utilize Ninigret Park. Atlantis Rising, also a large event with a regional draw, was permitted this spring.
The master planning effort has consumed two and a half years and many meetings with residents and stakeholders, during which time almost all voiced concerns about the direction of the planning effort. From the outset, the Town Council directed the consultant, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc. (VHB), to use the 2008 Master Plan and the 2014 draft, which expanded the 2008 plan, as the framework for the new plan, even though the town’s 2021 Community Survey does not support the commercialization of Ninigret Park or the creation of a new venue that would hold more than 1,000–3,000 attendees.
The 2021 Community Survey was conducted by a well-known and highly respected national survey company, and 2,270 residents responded to multiple mailings. The survey was statistically valid, meaning that the results accurately represented the population. The survey company reported: “The margin of error for this survey is ±2.1%. In essence, this means that 95% of the time, any statistic given in this report will be within 2.1 percentage points of what the entire voter/homeowner population would have given had they all been surveyed.”
The Survey found that residents overwhelmingly supported prioritizing their own needs over policies that encourage tourism. This did not differ much, if at all, by age, gender, employment status, full or part-time residency, or how long the respondent lived in the town.
About Ninigret Park specifically, the survey found that Ninigret Park is well-used and that most wanted the park maintained or were open to small (noncommercial) improvements. From a list, respondents selected the improvements that they supported, such as walking/jogging trails and more restrooms. The strongest opposition was to the addition of a football field, more large festivals, concession stands, or a large band shell.
One issue that remains unresolved is that traffic and other data were collected in 2007, 17 years ago. Because of the small amount of money allocated to the planning effort by the Town Council, no up-to-date data were collected. A new event with a regional draw, Atlantis Rising, was permitted this spring, and more appear to be contemplated; however, it is not known whether more events with a regional draw can be supported.
There has been no cost/benefit analysis performed and no assessment of other pressing, or desired, projects elsewhere. Charlestown’s taxpayers will pay, for the most part, for future development, and it is not clear how they will benefit. Further, there has been no assessment of what other projects might be put on the back burner, or forgone, because of the cost of implementing even a small part of this Utilization Plan.
The town’s policy regarding lighting in the 227-acre park needs to be addressed. Charlestown was at the forefront when it adopted a lighting ordinance in 2012, and Charlestown loves its rural community. Environmental issues are listed in the Utilization Plan, and one is that “Ineffective artificial lighting will impact migratory habits, reduce the areas of ecological importance, and impact the effectiveness of the Frosty Drew Observatory.” For many years, The Audubon Society, the National Park Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and many citizens have been alarmed that any additional artificial lighting might be allowed in Ninigret Park.
It’s time to move on from the assumption that large events with regional draws should be the basis for Charlestown’s economy. Our economy is instead based on eco-tourism, and the transfer of 227 acres of the former Charlestown Naval Auxiliary Landing Field to Charlestown presented unique opportunities for the town, including the economic benefits of Charlestown’s National Wildlife Refuges and other preserved land. In addition, the Frosty Drew Observatory and Science Center and Charlestown’s dark skies remain a large, untapped economic resource.
November 24, 2025 @ 12:29 pm
If Rom is elected say goodby to Ninigret Park the once beautiful nature preserve, this present town council will turn Ningret Park into a year round entertainment venue for more than “all town residents”.
I do not understand why! this present Charlestown town council refuses to listen to the 80/90% of town residents; Polco 2021 community survey!!! who want nothing to do with any! year round!! commercialization, exploitation; more large festivals, concession stands, a large band shell, or stadium lights at Ninigret Park.
“increasing activities for all to enjoy at Ninigret Park. Ninigret Park, a former Naval air training base is Charlestown’s gem that should be a passive and active recreational and entertainment area for all residents. This 55-acre town-owned parcel, plus the 172.4 acre parcel owned by the town with restrictions by the U.S. Department of Interior have endless possibilities for the enjoyment of all town residents.”
L. Rom
November 24, 2025 @ 9:05 am
Why do Marr, Slom, Stokes, Carney
“generally support moving forward with the cenceptual plan for Ninigret park.” The vast majority of Charlestown residents; 80/90 % of their! constituents!!!! the people they are elected to represent!! are absolutely opposed to any! such development/commercialization/expansion/exploitation/destruction of the federally recognized Nature Sanctuary that is! Ninigret Park
November 21, 2025 @ 12:10 pm
Ninigret Park commercialization/exploitation/destruction…
will? “REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL”?!!! Excellent!!!
Opposition to commercialization/exploitation/destruction of Ninigret Park
(Charlestown Citizens Alliance – CCA): Candidates supported by the CCA, such as Sarah Fletcher and Bonnie Van Slyke, have voiced strong opposition to the proposed plans, citing a 2021 resident survey that indicated the park should not be developed for large concerts or events. They express concern over potential “tens of millions of dollars” in costs and the impact on the town’s character and taxes.
AMEN!!!!!!! CCA!!!
Town Council Majority (Charlestown Residents United – CRU): Council President Carney and her allies (Craig Marr, Peter Slom, Stephen Stokes) generally support moving forward with a conceptual plan for Ninigret Park, emphasizing that any major funding would require voter approval at a Financial Town Meeting. They advocate for balanced community investments.
November 14, 2025 @ 12:24 pm
“Voters can stop this”?
“A vote in a open meeting of (by)? the council”?
This present council has been moving forward with their proposed, unwanted development, exploitation, destruction of Ninigret park against the wishes of 80/90% of those surveyed (2021 Polco community survey) Charlestown residents!! for years!!
Carney, and othe council persons listen? to specialists, consultants, experts then vote as they choose, not! for what the majority of their constituents surveyed want per the Polco 2021 Community survey. This type of non! representation! by your!!!!! locally elected officials is an absolute disgrace!! shameful! negatively effecting our natural environment for generations… forever!
If Ninigret Park’s future is in the hands of this present council? There is no hope for ninigret Park remaining the beautiful, peaceful National Wildlife Refuge it is. A protected Nature Preserve created by the United States Fish and Wildlife service.
November 9, 2025 @ 10:17 am
Residents of Charlestown!!! Be aware of what your present town council is doing!Bonding of already-paid-for land purchases is back on the Town Council agenda
A majority of the Charlestown Town Council is considering using money designated by voters in 2015 for one thing—preservation of open space—for something else.
October 31, 2025 @ 9:33 am
Stop! carney and this present town council from destroying Ninigret Park; Listen to the residents of Charlestown, they are elected to represent; POlCO 2021 Community Survey. This present council is
“Contradicting existing covenants with the Federal government (US Fish&Wild life Service/General Services Administration). 172 acres of (Ninigret Park) the park are subject to covenants
with (US Fish&Wild Life Service/GSA) requiring the land to be used “exclusively for public park or public recreation purposes in perpetuity. It is argued this not consistent with large-scale commercial development.”
October 31, 2025 @ 9:07 am
It is! a digrace! unethical! illegal? that carney and other Charlestown town counilors disregrd that 80/90% of residents they! are elected to represent do not want 90% of what this council is proposing at Ninigret Park!! Arguments against “the commercialization of Ninigret Park include a major financial burden for taxpayers, a disregard for residents’ preferences, the threat of light pollution and environmental damage, and potential conflicts with legal covenants and ongoing environmental remediation. These concerns are frequently raised by residents and groups such as the Charlestown Citizens Alliance in response to the “Ninigret Park Utilization Plan Update 2025”.
October 28, 2025 @ 9:30 am
Do not! let them turn the natural treasure that is! Ninigret Park into their “East Wing”; large festivals, concession stands, a large band shell, and a football stadium. Ninigret Park is a vital sanctuary for wildlife, the Charlestown community a place where diverse species are protected, and a crucial resource for both environmental health and human well-being. These areas provide essential habitats, support biodiversity, and contribute to the health of our ecosystems through functions like improving air and water quality, mitigating natural disasters, and preserving cultural heritage.
“The East wing (Ninigret Park) is destroyed, look what we have lost.”
July 24, 2025 @ 11:15 am
How best to inform all citizens of Charlestown, RI what their Town council is trying to do to Ninigret park.
Against the wishes of 84%/94% of charlestown residents.
July 17, 2025 @ 5:02 pm
“Looking at leveraging existing and proposed assets, layering uses, could make the plan much more efficient, more social, and community oriented, and more ecological.”
July 17, 2025 @ 8:32 am
While the extensive process, this plan, and many of the recommendations are very valuable, I can’t see where this plan follows placemaking principles as it claims to. Particularly antithetical to placemaking is the over-designed, and very expensive, investments in roads and parking, and the mostly mono-functional spaces.
I have actually worked with VHB in Newport, added to their team as the placemaking expert. They led their presentation off for this process with a discussion of placemaking and the 11 principles of placemaking that we developed at Project for Public Spaces, the organization from which we founded the global placemaking movement. I have also spent 50 summers in Ninigret Park, and before it was a park, playing in the abandoned air base. The park is very meaningful to my family, who are lucky to have it as a backyard.
What is really an infrastructure and facilities plan can now be built on to turn this into a more pragmatic and cost effective placemaking plan. Looking at leveraging existing and proposed assets, layering uses, could make the plan much more efficient, more social, and community oriented, and more ecological. It also should probably be cheaper, much less work for the Town to implement, and more generative of participation and ownership of the local community.
Whether the money is the issue or not, the town should not spend this much money. It will be a lot more to maintain. VHB may actually be incentivized to make it more expensive and draw more on their traffic engineering team, where their profit center likely is.
Happy to help if I can be constructive in the coming phases of discussion.
July 17, 2025 @ 10:41 am
Thank you! Mr. Kent.
July 17, 2025 @ 12:09 am
Charlestown, RI
Polcos Community survey 2021
The strongest opposition was to the addition of a football field, more large festivals, concession stands, or a large band shell!!!!
If our elected officials push fo any, or all of the above listed unwanted additions?
Vote! Them! Out!
July 13, 2025 @ 9:43 pm
I fear one of the council members sees himself as the next Geoerge Wein; Newport Jazz Festival. If you want traffic congestion, obnoxious drunkem tourists, crime, year round? Go to Newport! Stay! in Newport!
July 13, 2025 @ 8:09 pm
I would also like to know if voters can stop this and will there be plenty of notice before a vote.
July 14, 2025 @ 12:09 pm
Yes, voters can stop this, and if a vote to finance a construction project in Ninigret Park (such as, issuing a bond or using fund balance) were to be placed on the ballot for the General Election in November, there would be notice. In the meantime, voters may want to contact members of the Town Council about what they value and how they want their tax dollars spent. In the 2021 Community Survey, from a list of 24 possible uses for financial resources, only 27 % felt that improving or expanding large-sized special events, such as the Seafood Festival, is an essential or very important use of taxpayer money and staff time. From the same list, 84% responded that “maintaining a small-town identity”, and 94% thought “protecting the environment and natural resources” are essential or very important.
Deborah A. Carney – deb.carney@charlestownri.gov
Craig Marr – craig.marr@charlestownri.gov
Richard R. Serra – richard.serra@charlestownri.gov
Peter Slom – peter.slom@charlestownri.gov
Stephen J. Stokes – stephen.stokes@charlestownri.gov
July 13, 2025 @ 4:09 pm
RIP migrating birds and other species, star filled skies, peace and quiet, anything the majority of folks in this town actually want….
July 14, 2025 @ 7:29 am
“vote out the current business oriented town council in favor of a council that wants to preserve Charlestown’s rural nature that many of us moved here for.”
July 14, 2025 @ 7:33 am
The Survey found that residents overwhelmingly supported prioritizing their own needs over policies that encourage tourism. This did not differ much, if at all, by age, gender, employment status, full or part-time residency, or how long the respondent lived in the town.
July 14, 2025 @ 8:29 am
It’s time to move on from the assumption
that large events with regional draws
should be the basis for Charlestown’s
economy. Our economy is instead based on
eco-tourism, and the transfer of 227 acres of
the former Charlestown Naval Auxiliary
Landing Field to Charlestown presented
unique opportunities for the town, including
the economic benefits of Charlestown’s
National Wildlife Refuges and other
preserved land. In addition, the Frosty Drew
Observatory and Science Center and
Charlestown’s dark skies remain a large,
untapped economic resource.
July 13, 2025 @ 2:23 pm
I applaud Linda’s question …. one answer is to vote out the current business oriented town council in favor of a council that wants to preserve Charlestown’s rural nature that many of us moved here for.
A sub question is: “various aspects of the plan are going to require significant $ investemnts by the town … so at what $ value does the town council need to get voter approval for ?”
July 13, 2025 @ 8:02 pm
Charlestown’s budget is “a bottom-line budget.” That means the Town Council has authority to move funds from one place in the budget to another. However, such an action must be considered carefully because an item that the voters decided was worthy of funding may wind up short-changed. The Council can also use funds in its Council Contingency account for any purpose. To take any of these actions, however, there would need to be a vote in a open meeting of the Council.
July 17, 2025 @ 10:50 am
Thank you for your work in attempting to stop the plan from going forward. I have just now started reading about the council’s proposal and am horrified and ready to help the effort to stop the plan in any way you think I may be useful.
I am not a resident of Charlestown – I live in Warwick but have visited Frosty Drew many times all year around. Why do I go? The night sky there is simply awe inspiring and wonderful. The Observatory a destination for artists, poets, naturalists, astronomers, children and adults. In addition, it is extremely rare to have at our fingertips the darkest skies anywhere around!
Please let me know how I might work on this effort with all of you.
Linda
July 13, 2025 @ 10:34 am
Please keep me posted on future meetings l am interested in the future of ninigret
July 13, 2025 @ 10:29 am
Keep me posted on the progress of the park. I keep. Missing the meeting dates. Tks
July 13, 2025 @ 10:18 am
will the voters be able to stop this? it is unclear to me from this article if this is a done deal
July 13, 2025 @ 7:58 pm
Yes, voters can stop this, but vigilance will be necessary. The idea appears to be to have voters approve an expenditure for a construction project at the Financial Referendum next June. Such a significant expenditure, which will affect the tax rate, should be on the ballot for the November election instead. The election in November is the best way to get the idea before the most voters. It is sad, but true, that turnout for the Financial Referendum is very light. In the meantime, I suggest you write to the members of the Town Council to express your views.
Deborah A. Carney – deb.carney@charlestownri.gov
Craig Marr – craig.marr@charlestownri.gov
Richard R. Serra – richard.serra@charlestownri.gov
Peter Slom – peter.slom@charlestownri.gov
Stephen J. Stokes – stephen.stokes@charlestownri.gov