Town Council May Go To Court To Overturn 41 Years Of Elected Planning Commissions

When: Monday, July 24 at 7 p.m.
Where: Charlestown Town Hall
What: On the Town Council Meeting Agenda is, “Discussion and potential action to Petition the Rhode Island Superior Court for a Declaratory Judgment regarding the legality of Charlestown having an elected Planning Commission.”

UPDATE: The RI ACLU has written to the Town Council urging them to go slow in their actions to overturn Planning Commission elections. Read their letter.

Charlestown is unique in being the only municipality in Rhode Island that has a Planning Commission elected by the voters. Being unique is certainly not a bad thing nor is it illegal. In many Connecticut towns, members of the Planning and Zoning Commissions are elected. What we do in Charlestown may be unique in Rhode Island, but it isn’t that unusual.

In 1981, Charlestown’s voters approved our first Home Rule Charter; the Charter was ratified by the General Assembly and signed into law by the Governor. The Home Rule Charter specified that the Planning Commission was to be composed of five regular members and two alternate members, all elected in a general election. These provisions of the 1981 Charter have resulted in 41 years of elected Planning Commissions, members of which have been voted into office in 21 elections. The results of each of these elections have been certified by the state.

Margaret Hogan, a land use attorney who frequently brings development applications before the Planning Commission, has been trying for many years to get the town into court so that a court might rule that the Planning Commission is illegally composed. In 2008, when Jim Mageau was on the Town Council, and now in 2023, with the new “CRU” Town Councilors, there have been Town Councilors receptive to this idea.

In 2008, Ms. Hogan, as a member of the Charter Revision Advisory Committee, wrote a legal memorandum, and her conclusion was that RI law requires appointment rather than election of Planning Commissions. In response, Charlestown’s Town Solicitor at the time wrote an advisory opinion that the election of Planning Commissions in Charlestown is consistent with RI law, an opinion that left Mr. Mageau without sufficient votes from his fellow Town Councilors to go to court.

Now in 2023, Ms. Hogan has again been appointed to a Charter Revision Advisory Committee, along with another attorney who has appeared before the Planning Commission, a local gravel bank owner who is also a land developer, and several other members. They are once again claiming that the provisions of RI law which require an elected Planning Commission are illegal.

Their claim ignores the 2008 Solicitor’s opinion, a 2011 legal memorandum from Charlestown’s current Solicitor, and a recent and nearly parallel ruling involving a conflict between a RI law and another town’s Charter provision by the RI Supreme Court.

Despite all the legal evidence in support of Charlestown’s elected Planning Commission, Town Council President Deb Carney has put going to court against the duly elected Planning Commission on the agenda.

Having flawed legal arguments doesn’t stop the Town Council from going to court. The Town Council will have access to the Town’s treasury to fund their suit. If the Planning Commission does not have legal representation, the court will only hear one side of the argument. Perhaps that is how they think they can win.

The goal is to change the outcome of 21 elections and remove current elected officials from office, thwarting the will of the voters, so that they can appoint Planning Commission members more to their liking.

In addition to canceling the votes of 21 elections, what they propose violates the rights of the seven current Planning Commissioners who were elected by the voters to serve their terms and perform the duties prescribed in RI law, in Charlestown’s Home Rule Charter, and in our Zoning Ordinance. They have served in these positions, some since 2018, and have taken the oath of office. There is no basis for their removal other than this false claim that they were illegally elected.

Planning is all about land use, about issues of conservation, and about development. There are many things in which the Planning Commission does not have discretion, but there are other areas where it does. In areas of long-range planning, in the creation of regulations, and in the protection of natural resources, the decision of who sits on the Planning Commission makes a difference, and that decision ought to belong to the voters.


The banner image is a photograph of the 2018 Planning Commission hearing a developer’s proposal for a Dollar General at the corner of Old Post Road and Narrow Lane.