Ruth Platner: Surplus Should Be Used To Pay Long Term Debt

The following was sent to the Charlestown Town Council and is shared with us here by the author Ruth Platner. Ruth is a member of the Charlestown Planning Commission.


Charlestown’s Budget Commission and town government have been fiscally conservative for many years and that has resulted in one of the lowest tax rates in the state and made Charlestown one of RI’s most solvent towns.

There is much misinformation now circulating about the proposed budget, characterizing payments of debt obligation to the police pension as frivolous spending. Our new Town Treasurer has provided information that money put into the pension system will earn more long term than holding it in the surplus account.

A generation ago, town councils made promises to pay pensions to the police force. Those promises may have been easy to make, but eventually the promises must be kept. Charlestown may be ahead of other Rhode Island towns in paying down its debt to the Police Pension, but we still owe significant funds. The proposed budget contains an almost $1 million payment to Charlestown’s account in the police pension fund and other debt. This is not new spending; it is a partial payment of this debt.

The amount of debt payment this year is about the same as last year. It appears the Budget Commission is simply following the same prudent financial policies.

The argument Councilor Carney gave that we should return the Police Pension debt payment to the surplus so it can be spent on a future capital project or other spending as directed by popular survey results, is a false argument. These funds represent a debt, no matter where they are stored. They are not an asset. At some point they have to be paid to the pension fund and the Town Treasurer has given us a good reason to put them in the pension fund now rather than a savings account.

I preferred the budget that came from the Budget Commission, the changes proposed by Ms. Carney in April did not lower the tax rate, they just moved more money into surplus. Perhaps instead of moving those to surplus, the Council could put them into a short term (one or two year) account to deal with revenue shortfalls caused by COVID-19? I do ask now that you keep our debt payments on track and not move these payments as well back into the surplus account.

In the short term, moving money into surplus does not lower the tax rate, but using some of the surplus to pay down debt, does lower taxes in the future.

Thank you for your consideration,

Ruth Platner

 

 

You can learn more about the author, Ruth Platner, at her profile page.